JAISHREE VINODKUMAR SHAH,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 18(1)(5), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The assessee was granted liberty to seek restoration if the declaration under the scheme was not accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee had opted for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and received Form No.3. Consequently, the assessee sought withdrawal of the appeal before the tribunal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “एक-सदस्य मामला” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय श्री शक्तिजीत दे, न्याययक सदस्य एवुं माननीय श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल ,लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील सं./ (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Jaishree Vinodkumar Shah ITO-18(1)(5), Mumbai बिाम/ Room No.206, 2nd Floor Flat No.103, Chandanbala Apartment 4, R.R.T Marg, Off Ridge Rd. Earnest House, Nariman Point Vs. Mumbai – 400 006. Mumbai – 400 021. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAPPS-8609-G (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Assessee by : Letter dated 12/03/2021 Revenue by : Ms. Smita Verma – Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 22/03/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 05/04/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
The registry placed on record assessee’s letter dated 12/03/2021 wherein it has been submitted that the assessee has already opted for settlement of dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme), 2020 for the year under consideration and already received Form No.3 from appropriate authority. Therefore, the assessee seeks withdrawal of the appeal. The Ld. DR did not raise any objection.
In view of foregoing, the appeal stand dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to assessee to seek restoration of the appeal in case the aforesaid declaration filed under the scheme is not accepted, for whatever reasons. The appeal stand dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 5th April, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026