ACIT, NCC-9(1), CHENNAI vs. SHRI NILESH K. SHAH, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had paid dues under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the designated authority had issued Form No.5. Therefore, the appeals filed by the Revenue were liable to be dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against the CIT(A) order for AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13. The assessee submitted that they had paid dues under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the designated authority issued Form No.5.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee's settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI DUVVURU R.L. REDDY & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA
आदेश / O R D E R
PER DUVVURU RL REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The Revenue filed these appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai, in & 76/2018-19/CIT(A)-10/Chennai dated 31.07.2019 for the AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13.
By filing Form No.5, it was the submission of the learned counsel for the assessee that the assessee paid the dues under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the designated authority has issued Form No.5 on 31.03.2021 for the AY 2011-12 & on 26.03.2021 for the AY 2012-13. Thus, it was & 2836/Chny/2019 :: 2 ::
prayed for withdrawal of the appeals filed by the Revenue, against which, the learned DR fairly conceded the submissions of the learned counsel.
We have heard both the sides, perused the materials available on record and gone through the Form No.5.
We find that the assessee has already paid the dues under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, thereby, the designated authority has issued Form No.5 and thus, the appeals filed by the Revenue are liable to be dismissed as withdrawn. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in & 2836/Chny/2019 are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on the 25th day of November, 2021, in Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026