ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(4), CHENNAI vs. KANNAN DHANASEKAR, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Revenue was precluded from filing the appeal as the tax effect was less than the prescribed monetary limit. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue was liable to be dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT, Chennai, for the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee's counsel submitted that the tax effect in the appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit set by CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal
O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 18, Chennai, dated 31.01.2018 relevant to the assessment year 2012-13.
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the tax effect in the appeal filed by the Revenue is less than the monetary limit of ₹.50,00,000/- fixed by the CBDT to file an appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal as per the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08.08.2019. The ld. DR fairly conceded the submissions made by the ld. Counsel for the assessee. Being so, the Revenue authorities are precluded from filing the appeal before the Tribunal, since the tax effect is less than ₹.50,00,000/- in this appeal. Thus, the appeal filed by the Revenue is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed. However, the Department is at liberty to seek recall of the above order since, the ld. DR was not sure about as to whether the issue raised in the appeal of the Revenue is not arising out of RAP objection as no specific ground was raised in the grounds of appeal.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on the 02nd December, 2021 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026