SRI. B.M. FAROOK vs. DCIT,
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by both the assessee and the revenue. It granted liberty to the assessee to seek recall of the order if the settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act failed.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted to settle disputes under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, and had filed applications. The revenue requested that if the settlement process failed, they should be allowed to recall the order.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed given the assessee's settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, and if so, with what liberty to the parties.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI B. R. BASKARAN & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
This group of eleven appeals consists of (a) four appeals and two cross objections filed by the assessee and (b) five appeals filed by the revenue. All of them are directed against the orders passed by Ld CIT(A), Mysore for the assessment years mentioned in the caption against the respective ITA numbers.
The Ld authorised representative of the assessee has furnished a letter stating that the assessee has opted to settle the disputes arising in these appeals under Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. It is stated that the assessee has filed applications in Form 1 & 2 and is awaiting Form 3. Accordingly, the assessee has sought adjournment.
The Ld D.R submitted that the Bangalore bench of Tribunal is dismissing the appeals in such kind of cases giving liberty to seek recall of the order. The Ld D.R, further submitted that five appeals have been filed by the revenue and hence, if the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and if something goes wrong with the applications filed by the assessee for settlement of disputes, then the revenue should be given liberty to file applications seeking recall of the relevant order. The Ld D.R further submitted that the assessee should be directed to intimate the AO about the results of the applications filed by it and if they do not go through as desired by the assessee, then the assessee should persuade the AO to file necessary to 944/Bang/2013 ITA Nos.1020 to 1024/Bang/2013 & CO Nos.15 & 16/Bang/2013 Sri B.M. Farookh, Bangalore Page 3 of 4 applications seeking recall of this order within the statutory time limit prescribed under the Act.
We heard the parties and perused the record. Since the assessee has already filed applications under VSVS Act in respect of the appeals under consideration, we are of the view that no purpose would be served in keeping the appeals filed by both the assessee and revenue pending, since the same has to be withdrawn by them once the dispute is settled under the above said Act. Accordingly, we dismiss all the appeals under consideration.
However, we find merit in the submissions made by Ld D.R. Since the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed by us at the instance of the assessee, we direct the assessee to persuade the AO to file necessary applications for recall of this order in accordance with law within the statutory time period, if something goes wrong in respect of applications filed by the assessee under VSVS Act.
Since the assessee has not received Form no.3, we give liberty to the assessee to seek recall of the order passed for all or any of the appeals filed by him, if something goes wrong.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026