M/S MONITOR SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, acknowledging the violation of natural justice due to the ex parte order. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside and the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex parte as the assessee claimed to have not received any notice. The assessee became aware of the disposal of the appeal much later, leading to a significant delay in filing the present appeal before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) without proper notice to the assessee violates principles of natural justice. Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT should be condoned.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Shri Manish Borad, AM ]
ORDER
Per Shri A. T. Varkey, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-17, Kolkata dated 23.07.2019 for AY 2012-13.
At the outset, it has been brought to our notice that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) is an ex parte order. According to the Ld. AR, the assessee never received any notice from the Ld. CIT(A) about the listing of this appeal before him. According to Ld. AR, the assessee came to know about the disposal of this appeal only in September, 2020 by chance when the Ld. AR of the assessee enquired about the status of the case. Therefore, there was delay of 440 days in filing of this appeal. According to Ld. AR by not pursuing the appeal against the action of Ld. CIT(A), the assessee does not get any benefit and on the other hand the assessee is saddled with heavy demand from AO. Therefore, the delay caused is not intentional but has happened due to non-receipt of any notice or even the impugned order. In order to buttress this submission, the assessee’s director has filed an affidavit duly notarized before the Notary Public which is available in record dated 09.11.2020. Taking note of the Covid-19 pandemic and the facts noted (supra), we are of the opinion that there M/s. Monitor Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. AY 2012-13 is reasonable cause for delay being caused, so for the ends of justice, we are inclined to condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing.
As noted the impugned order is an ex parte order and from the affidavit it is discernible that the assessee did not receive any notice or even the impugned order and only on enquiry in September 2020 it came to know about the disposal of this appeal. Since there is violation of Natural Justice and the right of the assessee to file an appeal being statutory in nature, it would be rendered meaningless if the assessee is not heard and the Ld. CIT(A) is not able to look into the material adduced by the assessee to substantiate its case. Therefore, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) is set aside and we restore the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction to adjudicate the appeal afresh after affording reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 28th February, 2022.
Sd/- Sd/- (Manish Borad) (Aby. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated : 28th February, 2022 JD(Sr.P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant – M/s. Monitor Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., C/o Agarwal Vishwanath & Associates, 133/1/1A, S. N. Banerjee Road, Pushkal Bhawan, 3rd floor, Kolkata-700 013. 2 Respondent – ITO, Ward-2(1), Kolkata 3. CIT(A)-17, Kolkata. (sent through e-mal) 4. PCIT , Kolkata 5. DR, ITAT, Kolkata. (sent through e-mal)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026