AUM ADITYA RELATORS,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 21 (1)(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee's declaration under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' was accepted and Form-3 was issued. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2007-08. The assessee later opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' and requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY
आदेश/ ORDER
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, J.M: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-48, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 16/08/2018 for the assessment year 2007-08.
आअसं. 7378/मुं/2018 (िन.व.2007-08) (A.Y.2007-08)
A communication dated 31/05/2021 has been received from the counsels of assessee stating that the assessee has opted for ‘Viwad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ (in short ‘VSVS’) and hence, want to withdraw the appeal.
Shri Sanjay J. Sethi representing the Department stated that the Department has no objection if the assessee wants to withdraw appeal to avail the benefit of ‘VSVS’.
A perusal of above letter shows that the assessee’s declaration under VSVS for the impugned assessment year has been accepted and the Designated Authority has issued Form-3. In view of above, the appeal by assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on Tuesday, the 1st day of June, 2021. Sd/- (VIKAS AWASTHY) �याियक सद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER मुंबई/Mumbai, 2दनांक/Dated: 01/06/2021 SK, PS )ितिल�प अ3े�षत )ितिल�प अ3े�षतCopy of the Order forwarded to : )ितिल�प अ3े�षत )ितिल�प अ3े�षत 1. अपीलाथ(/The Appellant , 2. )ितवाद+/ The Respondent. 3. आयकर आयु4(अ)/ The CIT(A)- 4. आयकर आयु4 CIT 5. �वभागीय )ितिनिध, आय.अपी.अिध., मुबंई/DR, ITAT, Mumbai
आअसं. 7378/मुं/2018 (िन.व.2007-08) (A.Y.2007-08)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026