BALAJI REAL ESTATE VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 1(1)(2), BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and had filed the necessary applications. Therefore, it was deemed purposeless to keep the appeal pending.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2016-17. During the hearing, the assessee's representative stated that an application had been filed under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC-B’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI
O R D E R This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of CIT(A)-1, Bengaluru dated 17.06.2019 for the assessment year 2016-17. 2. At the time of hearing, the Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has filed application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and has filed Form 1 and 2. Learned Departmental Representative has no objection.
I have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. The assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. Since the assessee has already filed the necessary application before the tax authorities under the above said scheme, I am of the view that no purpose will be served in keeping this appeal pending. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Page 2 of 2 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026