DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SAYYAPARAJU VIJAYA RAMA RAJU, VISAKHAPATNAM
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per CBDT Circular No. 03/2018, appeals with a tax effect below Rs. 20 lakhs are not maintainable before the ITAT. Therefore, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The tax effect involved in these appeals was below Rs. 20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the revenue's appeals before the ITAT based on the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO& SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH
Per Bench: These appeals are filed by the revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) [CIT(A)]-10, Hyderabad vide I.T.A.No.0082/CIT(A)-10/2017-18/CIT(A), Hyd-10/10216/2017-18 and ITA No.0129/CIT(A)-10/2017-18/CIT(A), Hyd-10/10173/2017-18 dated 16.03.2018 for the assessment year 2013-14 and 2014-15 respectively.
Shri Sayyaparaju Vijaya Rama Raju, Visakhapatnam
When these appeals are taken up for hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the tax effect involved in these appeals is below Rs.20 lakhs. As per the latest circular No. 03/2018, dated 11.07.2018 10.12.2015 of CBDT being retrospective in nature, which is in supersession of its Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, in relation to filing of appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable. The Ld. D.R. has not raised any objection. In view of the above, the appeals filed by the revenue are not maintainable. Hence, the same are dismissed.
In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed.
The above order was pronounced in the open court on 10th October, 2018. (धड.एस. सुन्दर ससह) (िी.दुगाा राि) (V. DURGA RAO) (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) लेखा सदस्य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्याधयक सदस्य/JUDICIAL MEMBER धिशाखापटणम /Visakhapatnam ददिांक /Dated : 10.10.2018 L.Rama, SPS Shri Sayyaparaju Vijaya Rama Raju, Visakhapatnam
आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि/Copy of the order forwarded to:- ननर्ााररती/ The Assessee- Shri Sayyaparaju Vijaya Rama Raju, 50-121- 1. 49/1/10/4B, Geethika Residency, B S Layout, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam 2. राजस्व/ The Revenue – DCIT, Circle-3(1), Visakhapatnam
The Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam
The Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-10, Hyderabad 5. धिभागीय प्रधिधिधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, धिशाखापटणम /DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6.गाडाफ़ाईल / Guard file आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER ////
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026