BENNET PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED,VADODARA vs. THE DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the return for AY 2015-16, citing technical difficulties and judicial precedents. For AY 2014-15, the ground regarding PF/ESIC was dismissed as not pressed, but the denial of Section 80IC deduction was restored to the Assessing Officer for examination on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee company filed its Return of Income for AY 2015-16 on 01-11-2015, slightly after the due date of 31-10-2015, due to technical glitches during e-filing. The Assessing Officer denied the deduction under Section 80IC based on this delay. For AY 2014-15, the assessee's claim for employee's PF/ESIC contribution was disallowed, and the deduction under Section 80IC was also denied.
What were the issues?
Whether a short delay in filing the return of income due to technical glitches can lead to the denial of deduction under Section 80IC, and whether the denial of Section 80IC deduction for AY 2014-15 based on the non-filing of Form 10CCB electronically is justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 154,Section 139(1),Section 80IC,Section 80AC,Section 10CCB,Section 115BAA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. G.M. Knitting Industries (P.) Ltd.221 citing376 ITR 456 · 2015 · SC
- Zenith Processing Mills v. CIT86 citing219 ITR 721 · 1996 · HC
- CBDT v. Regen Infrastructure & Services (P.) Ltd.15 citing75 Taxmann.com 135 · 2016 · HC
- Cosme Matias Menezes (P.) Ltd. v. CIT6 citing379 ITR 31
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH
Before: Shri TR Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha
PER : TR SENTHIL KUMAR , JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
These appeals are filed by the assessee as against the separate appellate orders both dated 01-11-2023 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi arising out of the assessment orders passed u/s. 143(3) and 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) relating to the assessment year 2014-15 & 2015-16. 2 I.T.A Nos. 781 & 782/Ahd/2024 A.Y. 2014-15 & 2015-16 Page No.
The registry has noted that there is a delay of 110 days in filing the above appeals by the assessee. The assessee by
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026