MR GURDIP SINGH ANAND,MUMBAI vs. ACIT-21(1), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5890/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 June 2021AY 2013-142 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee's declaration under the 'Viwad Se Vishwas Scheme' was accepted and Form-3 was issued. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the 'Viwad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020' and requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the 'Viwad Se Vishwas Scheme'.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “SMC ”, MUMBAI

Hearing: 16/06/2021Pronounced: 16/06/2021

आदेश/ ORDER

1.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -48, Mumbai [in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 13/05/2019 for the assessment year 2013-14.

2.

A letter has been received from the assessee stating that the assessee has opted for 'Viwad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'( in short 'VSVS') and hence, want to withdraw the appeal.

3.

Shri Sanjay J. Sethi representing the Department stated that the Department has no objection if the assessee wants to withdraw appeal to avail the benefit of VSVS'.

4.

A perusal of above letter shows that the assessee's declaration under VSVS for the impugned assessment year has been accepted and the Designated Authority has issued Form-3. In view of above, the appeal by assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open Court on Wednesday, the 16th day of June, 2021

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →