DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S BROADCOM INDIA PVT. LTD., BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that no purpose would be served in keeping the appeals pending as they were to be withdrawn. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted to file an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute. The assessee requested that the appeals be treated as withdrawn.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE
O R D E R Per George George K, JM These are cross appeals directed against the order of the Assessing Officer passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) of the I.T.Act dated 27.01.2016. The relevant assessment year is 2011-2012.
At the time of hearing before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted for filing the application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, for 2 IT(TP)A No.484 & 658/Bang/2016. M/s.LSI India Research & Development Pvt.Ltd.. settlement of the dispute, and accordingly, prayed that the appeal may be treated as withdrawn. Accordingly, we are of the view that no purpose would be served in keeping the appeals pending, since the same are to be withdrawn, once the dispute is settled under the above said Act.
Accordingly, we dismiss the above appeals. However, liberty is given to the assessee and Revenue to seek recall of this order, if it warrants so.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee and Revenue are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026