TAMIL NADU BRICK INDUSTRIES,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to sufficient cause. Subsequently, as the assessee opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, the appeal was deemed withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT which was delayed by 392 days. The assessee later opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 for settlement of disputed tax.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal
O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 9, Chennai dated 31.08.2018 relevant to the assessment year 2013-14.
The appeal filed by the assessee is delayed by 392 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has filed a condonation petition in support of duly notarized affidavit to condone the delay. By referring to the condonation petition, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee company has received the order of the ld. CIT(A) dated 31.08.2018 in its office without noting the date of service which led to the incorporation of the date of order as date of communication of the order in Form No. 36 filed before the Tribunal. The ld. Counsel has further submitted that the delay of 392 days in filing the appeal is neither wilful nor deliberate but due to circumstances beyond the control of the assessee and prayed that the delay may be condoned and admitted the appeal for hearing. Against the above submissions, the ld. DR has not raised any serious objection. Consequently, since the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause, the delay of 392 days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and admitted the appeal for adjudication.
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, by filing Form No. 5 towards opting to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 for settlement of disputed tax vide his letter dated 09.02.2022, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has prayed that the appeal filed by the assessee may be deemed to be withdrawn against which the ld. DR has not opposed to the submissions of the learned Counsel.
We have heard both the sides, and perused the materials available on record. In this case, the assessee has opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2020 and the Designated Authority has issued Form No. 5 for the settlement of pending tax dispute. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is open to the assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing an appropriate application in the event of any prejudice caused in respect of the settlement of tax dispute under the Vivad-se- Vishwas Scheme 2020.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 18th February, 2022 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026