THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD.,SALEM vs. ACIT, CC(I/C), SALEM
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal. The Department did not oppose this request. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was delayed by 74 days due to the COVID-19 lockdown.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal
O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai dated 23.03.2020 relevant to the assessment year 2015-16 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short].
The appeal filed by the assessee is delayed by 74 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal due to COVID-19 lockdown.
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, by filing a petition for withdrawal of the appeal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee has instructed the ld. Authorised Representative to withdraw the appeal of the assessee and accordingly, it was prayed for withdrawal of the appeal, against which, the ld. DR has not opposed to the submissions of the learned Counsel. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 24th February, 2022 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026