THE SALEM DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION,SALEM vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 763/CHNY/2020Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 March 2022AY 2020-213 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted the Supreme Court's directions to condone delays due to the pandemic and directed the CIT(Exemptions) to reconsider the application. The assessee was also directed to make necessary compliances.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AA was rejected by the CIT(Exemptions). The assessee contended that the rejection was hasty and without sufficient opportunity, especially considering the COVID-19 lockdown.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemptions) erred in rejecting the Section 12AA registration application without providing adequate opportunity, considering the pandemic-induced lockdown.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL

For Respondent: Mr. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Hearing: 02.03.2022Pronounced: 04.03.2022

आदेश आदेश /O R D E R आदेश आदेश

PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, AM:

1.

This appeal is arising out of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai u/s.12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), dated 17.08.2020 rejecting the application for registration u/s.12AA filed by the Assessee.

2.

None appeared before us representing the Assessee while Shri. G. Johnson, Senior Departmental Representative represented the Department.

3.

The Assessee has taken the ground, wherein, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) has erred in hurriedly rejecting the application for registration u/s.12AA of the Act without giving sufficient opportunity of hearing and without considering the lock-down effect of Covid-19 pandemic.

4.

From the perusal of the impugned order which is dated 17th August, 2020, it is evident that the compliance period was under lock-down because of pandemic which has posed serious challenges before all in making the required compliances. This has been taken note of the Miscellaneous Application No.665 of 2021, 21 of 2022 and 29 of 2022 [in Suo Motto Writ Petition (c) No.3 of 2020] of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court (Civil Original Jurisdiction), vide order dated 10.01.2022; wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court has given the direction to condone the delay and waive the limitations across the Board, i.e. Courts, Tribunals of India. In the light of this suo motto direction and waiver on limitations and delays by the Hon’ble Apex Court considering the pandemic situation, we find it fit to direct the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) to reconsider the application for registration u/s.12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed by the Assessee.

5.

Section 12AA of the Act requires the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) to satisfy himself about the objects of :: 3 :: the trust and the genuineness of its activities, for which reasonable opportunity of being heard be given to the Assessee to establish its case. We also direct the Assessee to make necessary compliances for the notices issued by the Ld. CIT(E) substantiating its application for registration u/s.12AA of the Act.

6.

In terms of the above, we accordingly set aside the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) and remit the matter back to the file to him for de novo consideration.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in is allowed for statistical purposes.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →