M/S. FIRE AND SECURITY ASSOCIATION OF INDIA,CHENNAI vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-4, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It found that the CIT(A)'s order was ex-parte and lacked a speaking order on the merits of the exemption claim.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex-parte due to a 9-day delay in filing, attributed to the misplacement of the CIT(A)'s order by the accountant. The assessee sought condonation of this delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and whether the CIT(A) passed a proper speaking order on the merits of the exemption claim.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGHAND Dr. M.L. MEENA
आदेश /O R D E R PER BENCH:
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Chennai in dated 31.07.2019 for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessment was framed by the Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Ward 4, Chennai for the assessment year 2015-16 u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) vide order dated 27.12.2017.
At the time of hearing, it is noticed that the appeal is barred by limitation by 9 days and the assessee has filed affidavit for condonation of delay stating that the order of CIT(A) dated 31.07.2019 was received by assessee company on 10.08.2019 and the appeal was to be filed on or before 09.10.2019 but actually filed on 18.10.2019 with a delay of 9 days. It is stated that the accountant of assessee’s company Shri Logesh, who is looking after the company’s income tax matter and maintaining the records of appeal matters has misplaced the order with some other old documents. Subsequently, while rearranging the documents the order was traced and sent to the counsel for filing appeal. Later, the appeal has been prepared and filed with a delay of 9 days. The assessee stated that the delay is neither willful nor wanton but only due to misplacing of order by the accountant of the assessee company. When this was confronted to ld. Senior DR, he has not objected for condonation of delay. Hence, we condone the delay and admit the appeal.
At the outset, the ld.counsel for the assessee stated the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte and even on merits, he has just made a passing reference and not discussed how the assessee is not entitled for claim of exemption u/s.11 of the Act and how assessee has contravened the provision of section 13(3) of the Act. The ld.counsel
3 for the assessee took us through the order of CIT(A) and cited para 3.8, which reads as under:- “3.8 The notices for hearing were sent on 10.05.2019, 08.03.2019, 18.02.2019 and there has been no representation from the side of the assessee and it can be assumed that they have nothing to say in their defence. The case is hence being decided on the merits on the available record. “ 4. When this was confronted to ld. Senior DR, he fairly agreed that the matter can be restored back to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. After hearing rival contentions and going through the order of CIT(A), we notice that the order of CIT(A) is ex-parte and moreover there is no speaking order on the issue raised by assessee. Hence, we set aside the order of CIT(A) and remand the matter back to his file for fresh adjudication.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the court on 15th March, 2022 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026