BALBIR KAUR,HARYANA vs. ITO WARD-1(2), FARIDABAD

ITA 9409/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 July 2020AY 2010-112 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as the Assessing Officer had no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal, stating they had filed an appeal under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal could be withdrawn due to a settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH FRIDAY NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Chandak, CA

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT

This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A), Faridabad dated 22.10.2019 for assessment year 2010-11.

At the outset, Ld. AR drew our attention to a letter of the appellant requesting that this appeal may be allowed to be withdrawn as the assessee has filed the appeal before the Principal CIT, Faridabad under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.

The Ld. Sr. DR does not have any objection for the said request of the AR. Assessment year 2010-11

We have gone through the request submitted by the Ld. AR and since the Sr. DR does not have any objection, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →