SAUMYA KHURANA,FARIDABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 2(3), FARIDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6847/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 July 2020AY 2015-162 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal, as the respondent had no objection. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2015-16. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal as it was filed under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal could be withdrawn due to its eligibility under the Vivad se Vishwas Act.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH FRIDAY NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K.N. CHARY

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Verma, AR

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT

1.

This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax(A), Faridabad dated 29.08.2018 for assessment year 2015-16.

2.

At the outset, learned AR drew our attention to the letter of the appellant requesting for withdrawal of this appeal as the same has been filed under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.

3.

The Ld. Sr. DR does not have any objection to the said request of the assessee.

ITA 6847//D/2018 Assessment year 2015-16

4.

We have gone through the request submitted by the Ld. AR and since the Sr. DR does not have any objection, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the Open Court today in the presence of the parties through video conferencing.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →