SEJ DEVELOPERS PVT LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT CC 5 (2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 7869/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 September 2021AY 2008-093 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, while acknowledging the assessee's negligence, decided to grant another opportunity of hearing in the interest of natural justice. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for re-adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to appear for the hearing before the ITAT, and had also not appeared before the CIT(A) despite multiple opportunities. The Revenue requested for dismissal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee's non-appearance, or if another opportunity for hearing should be granted.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

For Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Menon– Ld. Sr. DR

O R D E R

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →