PRITI AGGARWAL,DELHI vs. ITO WARD 55 (3), DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal, subject to the successful completion of the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme formalities. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order confirming an addition of Rs. 45,53,425/- on account of disallowed business loss. The assessee later opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “SMC” : DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI B.R.R. KUMAR
This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-19, New Delhi, Dated 11.12.2018, for the A.Y. 2015-2016, challenging the Orders of the authorities below in making/confirming addition of Rs.45,53,425/- on account of business loss disallowed by the A.O.
2 ITA.No.1544/Del./2019 Ms. Priti Aggarwal, Delhi. 2. We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties through video conferencing.
Learned Counsel for the Assessee, at the outset submitted that assessee has opted for VIVAD SE VISHWAS Scheme and filed Form Nos. 1 and 2. Learned Counsel for the Assessee, therefore, submitted that assessee may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal, subject to issue of Form No.3.
In view of the above statement made by Counsel for Assessee, assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeal, subject to issue of Form No.3. In view of the above, appeal of assessee stands disposed of, in terms indicated above.
In the result, appeal of Assessee disposed of.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026