MUKESH KUMAR (HUF),RAMPUR vs. ITO WARD - 1(2), RAMPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5560/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 August 2020AY 2015-163 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal consigned the appeal to records and treated it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee opted to settle tax arrears for AY 2015-16 under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee filed the necessary declaration as per the Act.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the impact of the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Act on the pending appeal before the Tribunal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 4

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘Friday A’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Respondent: Shri Saras Kumar, Senior DR
Hearing: 28/08/2020

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), Moradabad dated 13th May, 2019.

2.

Nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee before us at the time of the Virtual Hearing. In the captioned appeal, the appellant assessee has informed that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. It has been stated that the necessary declaration in accordance with Section 4 of The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 has been filed by the assessee.

3.

Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

4.

However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforestated Act, the appellant (i.e., the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The respondent (i.e., the Revenue) has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 28th August, 2020.

More judgments on Section 4

All 1,145 judgments and leading authorities on Section 4 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →