THEY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. ITO, TDS-WARD-76(4), DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The withdrawal is subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a bunch of appeals against an order of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16. The assessee requested withdrawal of these appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw appeals due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI
PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, VP The present bunch of appeals filed by assessee is against order of CIT(A)-41, New Delhi dated 18.06.2019 relating to assessment years 2014-15 & 2015-16 against the order passed under section 154/200A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
The Ld. AR for the assessee has requested for withdrawal of the appeals filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee is opting the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the Assessment Years under consideration under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A declaration under “The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020” is being filed by the assessee, hence the appeals are being withdrawn.
The Ld. DR for the Revenue has no objection to the same.
However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the afore-stated Act, the appellant (i.e. the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The Ld.DR for the Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of all the appeals.
In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 31st August, 2020.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026