TUSHAR AGARWAL,MORADABAD vs. ITO -2(2), MORADABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. However, it was subject to a condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2015-16. The assessee later filed an application to withdraw the appeal, stating they had opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘FRIDAY-A’, NEW DELHI
सुनवाई क" तारीख / घोषणा क" तारीख / Date of Hearing : 04.09.2020 Date of Pronouncement: 04.09.2020 आदेश आदेश / ORDER आदेश आदेश PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, VP The present appeal filed by assessee is against order of CIT(A), Moradabad, dated 10.06.2019 relating to assessment year 2015-16 against the order passed under section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
2 Assessment Year: 2015-16
None appeared on behalf of the assessee, however, an application dated 26.08.2020 for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the Assessment Year under consideration under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”.
The Ld. DR for the Revenue has no objection to the same.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.
However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the afore-stated Act, the appellant (i.e. the assessee) shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The Ld. DR for the Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 04th September, 2020. (R.K. PANDA) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) लेखा सद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER उपा"य" उपा"य" उपा"य" / VICE PRESIDENT उपा"य" लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य "द"ली "द"ली "द"ली / "दनांक Dated : 04th September, 2020 "द"ली Shekhar.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026