ACIT- 27 (3), MUMBAI vs. VIKAS TESTING & DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5711/MUM/2018Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 September 2021AY 2009-103 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that no purpose would be served in keeping the appeal pending as the assessee opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee intended to settle tax litigation by opting for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020' and had received Form 5 under the scheme. The Assessing Officer had no objections.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the pendency of the appeal when the assessee chose to settle the tax dispute under a specific scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 250,Section 254(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI

For Respondent: Shri S.N. Kabra. DR
Hearing: 14.09.2021Pronounced: 15.09.2021

O R D E R

PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM:

1.

The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-25, Mumbai passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2.

At the time hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee, we find that the assessee has submitted a letter dated 11 September 2021 mentioning that the M/s Vikas Testing & Devp Laboratory, Mumbai assessee intend to settle the tax litigation by opting for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ (VSVS2020) and received Form 5 under VSVS Rules 2020. Contra, the Ld. DR has no objections.

3.

We heard the Ld. DR and perused the material on record. Since the assessee has opted for ‘Vivaad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ and received Form-5 from the income tax department. We are of the view that, no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn and the assessee is given liberty to move an application u/s 254(2) of the Act to recall the present order as per provisions of Law.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →