SHRI ASHOK BOKADIA,MUMBAI vs. LATIKA REDKAR, ITO - 19(1)(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that non-filing of an appeal in electronic form is a curable procedural defect. Following its own precedents, the Tribunal restored the appeals to the file of the CIT(A) for disposal on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were dismissed by the CIT(A) on technical grounds for not filing them in electronic form. The assessee did not appear before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the dismissal of an appeal on technical grounds for non-electronic filing is sustainable. Whether such a procedural defect can be cured by restoring the appeal to the lower authority.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HONBLE
O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD (JM) These appeals are filed by the assessee against different orders of 1. the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–30, Mumbai [hereinafter in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 13.12.2018 for the Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2012-13.
2 & 1976/MUM/2020 (A.Ys: 2010-11 & 2012-13) Shri Ashok Bokadia Assessee has raised his grievance that the Ld.CIT(A) dismissed the 2. appeals on technical ground as the assessee has not filed the appeals in electronic form but filed manually.
Inspite of issue of notice none appeared on behalf of assessee nor 3. any adjournment was sought. Therefore, I proceed to dispose of these appeals on hearing Ld. DR on merits.
Ld. DR vehemently supported the orders of the authorities below. 4.
Heard Ld. DR, perused the orders of the authorities below. It is 5. noticed that an identical issue had come up before the Coordinate Bench in the case of All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v. ITO in ITA.No. 7134/MUM/2017 [64 ITR (Trib.) 0704] and the Tribunal held that non-filing of appeal in the electronic form is only a procedural defect which can be cured and the Tribunal restored the appeal back to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) for disposal on merits and the assessee was directed to file appeal in electronic form within ten days on receipt of order. Similar view has been taken by the Coordinate Bench in the various decisions. Following the above decisions, these appeals are restored to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) and assessee is directed to e-file the aforesaid appeals
3 & 1976/MUM/2020 (A.Ys: 2010-11 & 2012-13) Shri Ashok Bokadia within a period of Fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of this order, consequent to which delay in e-filing shall stand condoned and the Ld.CIT(A) shall dispose off the appeals on merits. Needless to say that the Ld.CIT(A) shall give adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical 6. purpose.
Order pronounced on 05.10.2021 as per Rule 34(4) of ITAT Rules by placing the pronouncement list in the notice board.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026