M/S. QUEST SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,IRELAND vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE- 2(1), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2531/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 July 2021AY 2016-172 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the payment received by the assessee for the sale of software does not constitute royalty. This decision was based on a Supreme Court judgment with identical facts.

What were the facts?

The assessee received a payment of Rs.42,96,49,035 for software sale. The Assessing Officer and DRP treated this payment as royalty under the DTAA and IT Act. The assessee appealed this decision.

What were the issues?

Whether the sale of software is taxable as royalty under the Income Tax Act and the DTAA.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 9(1)(vi)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “C”, BANGALORE

Hearing: 27.07.2021Pronounced: 27.07.2021

O R D E R

Per George George K, JM

1.

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against final assessment order dated 21.10.2016, passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the I.T.Act. The relevant assessment year is 2016-2017.

2.

The solitary issue raised is whether sale of software was liable to be taxed as royalty.

3.

Brief facts of the case are as follow: The draft assessment order was passed on 28.12.2010, wherein it was concluded that payment of Rs.42,96,49,035 received by the assessee-company would constitute royalty within the meaning of Article 12(3) of the DTAA and as per the provisions of section 9(1)(vi) of the I.T.Act. The assessee filed objections to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The DRP issued directions dated 26.09.2019. The DRP rejected all the 2 IT(IT)A No.2531/Bang/2019. M/s.Quest Software International Limited. objections raised by the assessee. Accordingly, the final assessment was passed on 21.10.2019.

4.

Aggrieved by the final assessment, the assessee has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal. At the very outset, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the issue in question is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence P.Ltd. v. CIT reported in [2021] 432 ITR 471 (SC). The learned Departmental Representative was not able to controvert the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the assessee. In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court, which is identical to the facts of this case, we hold that the payment of Rs.42,96,49,035 received by the assessee-company would not constitute royalty and cannot be brought to tax. It is ordered accordingly.

More judgments on Section 9(1)(vi)

All 1,705 judgments and leading authorities on Section 9(1)(vi) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →