What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2014-15. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Ramesh Kumar Goyal, Hisar vs ITO | ITAT Delhi 2020

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARYSHRI SHRI

For Appellant: Shri Manish Uppal, AR

For Respondent: Shri M. Baranwal, Senior DR

Hearing: 25.09

PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), Hisar dated 28th June, 2019.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide letter dated 11th 2. September, 2020 received through email has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

2 ITA-7516/Del/2019

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced in the presence of both the parties on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 25th September, 2020.

RAMESH KUMAR GOYAL,HISAR vs. ITO, WARD-3, HISAR

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Recent GST High Court judgments