NAGNATH MAHADEV,DWARKA vs. CIT(E), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged the delay but, considering the circumstances and the assessee's undertaking to provide all necessary documents, granted one more opportunity for hearing. A cost of Rs. 5,000/- was imposed on the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee Trust filed appeals with a significant delay after their applications for registration under Section 12AB and Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act were rejected by the CIT(E). The delay was attributed to a tax consultant's non-compliance with hearing notices.
What were the issues?
Whether to condone the substantial delay in filing appeals and grant an opportunity for fresh hearing for registration under Section 12AB and 80G(5) of the Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH
Before: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha
Nagnath Mahadev CIT (Exemption), A-15, Shree Nagnath Ahmedabad Mahadev Mandir, Vs Okha Mandal Dwarka, Devbhumi Dwarka-361345 Dwarka, Gujarat PAN: AABTN8147N (Respondent) (Appellant) Assessee Represented: Shri Chetan Agarwal, A.R. Revenue Represented: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR Date of hearing : 23-06-2025 Date of pronouncement : 25-06-2025 आदेश/ORDER PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
These two appeals are filed by the Assessee as against rejection of registrations under section 12AB and under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) vide orders dated 25.07.2023 & 22.07.2023 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad.
& 822/Ahd/2025 Page No 2 Nagnath Mahadev vs. CIT(E)
The registry has noted that there is a delay of 577 days and 574 days in filing the above appeals by the assessee Trust. The trustee of the assessee filed a Notarized Affidavit explaining that the Trust have entrusted the task as obtaining registrations u/s. 12AB & u/s. 80G of the Act to a Tax Consultant at Dwarka. The said Tax Consultant after making applications have not complied to the hearing notices given by Ld. CIT(E), which has resulted in rejecting registration of the Trust. When one of the Trustee enquired with the Chartered Accountant at Jamnagar, the status of the applications made before Ld. CIT(E), it came to light the rejection order passed by Ld. CIT(E). It is thereafter the appeals were filed with a delay of 577 days and 574 days. The Assessee Trust is not benefitted by late filing of these appeals but however the unawareness of statutory appeals is the reason for the delay and however undertake to file all relevant materials before Ld. CIT(E) by providing one more opportunity of hearing to the assessee Trust.
The Ld. CIT-DR appearing for the Revenue stated that substantial delay in filing the above appeals, hence cost may be imposed on the assessee.
We have given our thoughtful consideration and perused the materials available on record. Ld. Counsel Shri Chetan Agarwal appearing for the Assessee specifically undertook that trust will file all required details, documents before Ld. CIT(E) for the purpose of granting registration u/s. 12AB and u/s. 80G(5) of the Act.
& 822/Ahd/2025 Page No 3 Nagnath Mahadev vs. CIT(E)
Recording the above submissions of both parties and to meet the ends of justice, we impose a cost of Rs. 5,000/- payable by the assessee Trust to the Income Tax Department within two weeks of receipt of copy of this order and producing challan for payment of cost, Ld. CIT(E) is directed to give one more opportunity of hearing to the assessee Trust for granting registrations u/s. 12AB and u/s. 80G(5) of the Act and in accordance with the provisions of law.
In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026