ITO (EXEMPTION),WARD VADODARA, VADODARA vs. MML CHOUDHRY CHARITBALE & EDUCATION TRUST, HARI NAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The CIT(A) allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the revised Form 10, rectifying a typographical error, should be considered for accumulation under Section 11(2) and 11(5). The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal, affirming that exemption cannot be denied due to wrong details in the original audit report if verifiable.
What were the facts?
An Educational Trust declared Nil income, claiming exemption under Section 11. Due to a clerical error, Form 10 showed Rs. 3,75,000/- instead of Rs. 3.75 crores for accumulation. The CPC denied the exemption under Section 143(1) and rejected the rectification petition due to belated filing of Form 10.
What were the issues?
Whether a revised Form 10, rectifying a typographical error regarding accumulated funds, can be considered for claiming exemption under Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act, even if filed belatedly, when the assessee's intention and investment mode are verifiable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 11(2),Section 11(5),Section 143(1),Section 154,Section 11(2)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH
Before: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha
PER : T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-
This appeal is filed by the Revenue as against the appellate order dated 30.01.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (in short referred to as “CIT(A)”), arising out of the rectification order passed under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2022-23. 2. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee is an Educational Trust filed its Return of Income for the Asst. Year 2022-23 on 03- 10-2022 declaring Nil income after claiming exemption u/s. 11 of I.T.A No. 645/Ahd/2025 A.Y. 2022
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026