DCIT CIRCLE 1, THANE vs. M/S ADVANCE ENZYME TECHNOLOGIES LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S ADVANCE BIOCHEMICALS LTD), THANE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the substantial additions against which the penalty was levied were deleted by the Tribunal itself, the penalty would not survive. For other smaller additions, the Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A) that there was a bona fide mistake and no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the deletion of a penalty of Rs. 292.30 Lacs levied under Section 271(1)(c) by the Assessing Officer. The penalty was based on additions made in the assessment order.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the primary additions leading to the penalty have been deleted. Whether bona fide mistakes in computation of income warrant penalty.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Price Waterhouse Coopers Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT359 citing348 ITR 306 · 2012 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण “ए” न्यायपीठ म ुंबई में। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI माननीय श्री विकास अिस्थी, न्यावयक सदस्य एवं माननीय श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल ,लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM (Hearing through Video Conferencing Mode) आयकरअपील सं./ (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) DCIT Circle – 1 M/s Advance Enzyme Technologies Ltd 6th floor, Ashar IT Park (formerly known as Advance Biochemicals Ltd.) बिाम A-Wing, 5th floor, Sun Magnetica R. No. 22, B-Wing / LIC Service Road, Louis Wadi Wagle Indl. Estate Vs. Thane-400 604 Road No. 16Z, Thane(W) Pin-400 604 स्थायीलेखासं./ जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No. AABCA-4555-E (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Revenue by : Shri Brajendra Kumar – Ld. Sr. DR Assessee by : Ms. Dinkle Haria – Ld. AR सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 28/09/2021 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 01/10/2021 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026