BAKERI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(1)(1), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

ITA 954/AHD/2025Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 July 2025AY 2020-21Bench: S/SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR (Accountant Member)13 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was unsustainable. The assessment order was not erroneous as the AO had conducted detailed inquiries and allowed set-off only to the eligible extent, and the PCIT's premise was factually incorrect.

What were the facts?

The assessee company, engaged in real estate, filed its return for AY 2020-21 declaring NIL income after setting off unabsorbed depreciation. The PCIT initiated revision proceedings under Section 263, alleging the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to incorrect set-off of brought forward depreciation.

What were the issues?

Whether the PCIT correctly invoked Section 263 powers when the assessment order was based on detailed inquiry and the PCIT's premise was factually flawed, and whether the AO's actions constituted an 'erroneous' order prejudicial to revenue.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 142(1),Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: S/SHRI SANJAY GARG & MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Shah, AR, and Shri Bharat Shah, AR
Hearing: 25/06/2025Pronounced: 04/07/2025

आदेश आदेश आदेश

PER MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR, AM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the revisionary order dated 26.03.2025 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”] by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as "Ld. PCIT"], for the Assessment Year 2020–21, whereby the assessment order passed under section ITA No.954 /Ahd/2025

143(3) r.w.s. 144B dated 27.

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →