TTEC INDIA CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE PR.CIT-3, AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer had made sufficient inquiries and accepted the assessee's claims based on the evidence provided. The PCIT's revisionary order was found to be without demonstrable basis, as the facts were similar to a previous year's case where the claim was allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, engaged in ITES and BPO services, had its assessment order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144B set aside by the PCIT under section 263. The PCIT believed the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue regarding CSR expenses and foreign tax credit.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT correctly invoked Section 263 to revise an assessment order where the AO had made inquiries and accepted the assessee's claims regarding CSR expenses and foreign tax credit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 80G,Section 37(1),Section 90
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
आदेश आदेश
PER MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR, AM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad-3 [hereinafter referred to as "the PCIT"], dated 30.03.2025, under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), for the assessment year 2020–21, whereby the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026