ACIT, CIRCLE-11(1) vs. EICHER GOOD CANTH LTD.,
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and the assessee's cross-objection. The dismissal was with liberty to the Department to file a Miscellaneous Application for recalling the order if Form 3 was not issued to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee company opted to settle tax disputes under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and filed declarations. However, the Designated Authority had not yet issued the certificate in Form 3 accepting the declaration.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be adjourned or dismissed given the assessee's intent to settle under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, pending the issuance of the final certificate.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘C’ BENCH,
Before: SHRI H.S. SIDHU & SHRI O.P. KANT
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER O.P. KANT, AM: These appeals by the Revenue are preferred against the separate orders of the Ld. CIT(A) - XIV, New Delhi dated 18.3.2002 & 19.7.2002 pertaining to A.Ys 1998-99 & 1999-2000 and Cross Objection has been filed by the Assessee in Revenue’s (AY 1999-2000).
At the time of hearing, Ms. Manisha Sharma, Advocate/Authorised Representative of the Assessee filed a letter dated 19.10.2020 and reiterated the contents thereof by stating that assessee company has opted to settle the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment years under consideration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and referred the letter dated 21.4.2020 filed with the Department intimating about Declaration in Form 1 filed online at pages 1 to 6 alongwith Form 1 filed in respect of each appeal attached at pages 7 to 19 (for AY 1998-99) and pages 20 to 30 (for AY 1999-2000). She has also submitted that although the Declaration in Form 1 in accordance with Section 4 has been filed by the assessee company, however, the Designated Authority has not yet granted the Certificate in Form 3 under Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 accepting the said declaration and determining the tax arrears to be paid by the assessee. Therefore, she requested that the present appeals may be adjourned to a later date, subject to the convenience of the Bench. In the last she 2 &3971/DEL/2002 & CO NO. 166/DEL/2005 (IN ITA NO. 3971/DEL/2002)
also submitted that the captioned appeals would be withdrawn once the Designated Authority accepts the declaration filed by the assessee issues Form 3 under section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Ld. Sr. DR has not raised any serious objection.
We have heard both the parties and perused the records especially the letter dated 19.10.2020 filed by the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee wherein she has stated that assessee company has opted to settle the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment years under consideration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. It was also noted from the aforesaid letter that although the Declaration in Form 1 in accordance with Section 4 has been filed by the assessee company, however, the Designated Authority has not yet granted the Certificate in Form 3 under Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 accepting the said declaration and determining the tax arrears to be paid by the assessee. We further note that assessee’s counsel has further mentioned in her letter dated 19.10.2020 that the captioned appeals would be withdrawn once the Designated Authority accepts the declaration filed by the assessee issues Form 3 under section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Keeping in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, in our view the Appeals of the Revenue should be disposed of with the liberty to &3971/DEL/2002 & CO NO. 166/DEL/2005 (IN ITA NO. 3971/DEL/2002)
the Department that if the Department does not issue Form No. 3 to the Assessee, then the Department is at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Application for recalling this order. In view of above, both the Appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed with liberty to file Misc. Application for recalling the order if Form No. 3 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 is not issued to the Assessee.
As regards the Assessee’s Cross Objection is concerned, since we have already dismissed the Revenue’s Appeal No. 3971/Del/2002 (AY 1999-2000), as aforesaid, hence, the cross objection filed by the Assessee has become infructuous and dismissed as such with liberty to file Misc. Application for recalling the order, in case Misc. Application is filed by the Department.
In the result, both the Revenue Appeals as well as Assessee’s Cross Objection stand dismissed.
The order is pronounced on 20.10.2020.
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026