DISHA RESOURCES LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ARIHANT AVENUES AND CREDIT LIMITED.),AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the donation was not allowable under Section 35(1)(ii) because the recipient institute was not approved for receiving such donations during the relevant assessment years. The claim was based on forged documents and the intention behind the claim, whether bona fide or not, was immaterial.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a weighted deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) for donations made to an institute. However, investigation revealed that the institute was not approved for receiving such donations after a certain date and was involved in providing bogus donation receipts to donors.
What were the issues?
Whether the weighted deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) is allowable when the recipient institution is not approved for receiving donations and is involved in fraudulent practices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Andaman Timber Industries v. CCE1,335 citing127 DTR 241 · 2015 · SC
- PCIT v. Swati Bajaj443 citing446 ITR 56 · 2022 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-Ms SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, VICE-PRESIDENT:
- The captioned two appeals are filed by the Assessee against the common appellate order dated 18.02.2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, relating to the Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2014-15. Since the issues raised in these two appeals are common, we are extracting the grounds of appeal in ITA No.534/Ahd/2025 for A.Y 2013-14 for the purpose of adjudication.
ITA Nos. 534-535/Ahd/2025 Asst. Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15 - 2–
The
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 35(1)(ii)
- ACIT-19(3), Mumbai vs Zeenat Shafique Jagani, MumbaiITA 3721/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- High Volt Electricals Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, PalgharITA 3049/MUM/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2016-2017
- Vijay Transtech Private Limited, Mumbai vs ACIT Circle-11(3)(2), MumbaiITA 2644/MUM/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2016-2017
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Torrent Power Limited, AhmedabadITA 1117/AHD/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2011-12
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle… vs Torrent Power Limited, AhmedabadITA 1076/AHD/2024[2010-11]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2010-11
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026