SHRI. DHONDIRAM HEMU RATHOD,VIJAYAPURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1, BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2563/BANG/2019Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 August 2021AY 2011-122 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's decision to opt for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. Consequently, the appeal was treated as withdrawn by the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for the assessment year 2011-2012. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel submitted a letter indicating the assessee's intention to resolve the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “B”, BANGALORE

Before: Shri George George K, JM & Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM

Hearing: 26.08.2021Pronounced: 26.08.2021

O R D E R

Per George George K, JM

1.

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 26.09.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2011-2012.

2.

At the time of hearing before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee has placed a letter dated 19.08.2021, and contended that the assessee had opted to resolve the dispute raised in this appeal under the provisions of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. He, therefore, prayed that the appeal may be treated as withdrawn. In view of the submission made by the learned Counsel for the assessee, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee as withdrawn.

. Shri Dhondiram Hemu Rathod. 3. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →