BHOOP SINGH,NOIDA vs. ITO, WARD- 1(2), NOIDA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3024/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 October 2020AY 2008-092 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2008-09. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNUBEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVASHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVASHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVASHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Appellant: Shri Raghuraj Singh, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Jagdish Singh Dahiya

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT : PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT

1.

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2008-09 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-I, Noida dated 29th October, 2018.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide letter dated 22nd 2. October, 2020 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

2 ITA-3024/Del/2019

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced in the presence of both the parties on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 28th October, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →