UDIT JAIN,NEW DELHI vs ITO WARD - 57(5), NEW DELHI

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Appellant: Shri Raj Kumar, CA

For Respondent: Shri Jagdish Singh Dahiya, Sr. DR

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-37, New Delhi dated 24.12.2018 and pertains to assessment year 2014-15.

The learned counsel for the assessee , vide letter dated 24th October, 2020 2. received through email has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing in the presence of both the parties on 28th October, 2020.

UDIT JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 57(5), NEW DELHI