JAYAM VYAPAAR PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-1(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) as the assessee remained uncooperative and failed to provide any evidence to counter the additions made by the AO. The additions were on account of unexplained share capital.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not appear before the AO or the CIT(A) and failed to provide required details. The directors of the company were untraceable, and the company was suspected to be a shell company involved in a scam.
What were the issues?
Whether the additions made on account of unexplained share capital are justified when the assessee fails to provide any evidence or appear before the authorities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
This is the appeal preferred by the assessee is against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-17, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 18.12.2018 for the AY 2012-13.
Assessment Year: 2012-13 Jayam Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assesse at the time of hearing nor any application seeking adjournment was filed. Therefore we are deciding the appeal ex- parte after hearing the ld DR and after considering the merits of the case.
The assessee has raised various grounds of appeal challenging the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A). We observe from the order of AO that the assessee was total non compliant in the matter of filing the requisite details sought by the AO as neither assesse nor its authorized representative apeared. So much so that the assesse did not appear at all in the appellate proceedings before the first appellate authority. In other words in the appellate proceedings before the Ld. CIT(A) neither the assessee nor his authorized representative appeared to present its case on merit. During the course of hearing, the Departmental Representative brought to our notice that the directors of these companies were not traceable despite best effort by the department and all these companies are shell companies and part of scam operated by unscrupulous elements on whom the law could not lay its hands. Under these circumstances, we are proceedings to decide and dispose off the appeal ex-parte.
After hearing Ld. D.R and after of the perusal of various grounds of appeal reveals we note that the additions as made by the AO was on the account of introduction of unexplained share capital which could not be verified by both the authorities below. We note that the assesse was not cooperative before the AO whereas before the ld. CIT(A) the assessee did not appear at all. We further note that both the authorities below have given findings on these additions that this introduction of money remained unexplained and the investigation carried out by the revenue points to the deeper conspiracy to routing the unaccounted money in the form of share capital/share premium. We further observe that the assessee has not filed any evidences/confirmations/produce books of accounts before us to take a contrary view. Under this circumstance, we do not find any infirmity in the order of Ld. CIT(A) and are inclined to uphold the same by dismissing the appeal of the assessee.
Assessment Year: 2012-13 Jayam Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 29th August, 2022
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026