SHINE STAR,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 19(3), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged that once a matter is resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the related appeal is required to be withdrawn. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal, stating that the matter was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020. The Departmental Representative did not oppose the prayer.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn and dismissed due to the settlement of the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI ‘SMC’ BENCH, MUMBAI
O R D E R Per Pramod Kumar, VP : 1. The assessee has moved petition seeking withdrawal of the appeal and the assessee has also filed Form No. 1, 2 & 3 on the ground that the matter is settled under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.
Learned Departmental Representative does not oppose the prayer so made by the assessee.
There is no dispute that once the matter is resolved under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020, the related appeal is required to be withdrawn.
In view of the above position, as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, we deem it fit and proper to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026