YATISH GULATI (DHAWAN),FARIDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-2(5), FARIDABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6846/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 November 2020AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal via email.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA SHRI AMIT SHUKLASHRI SHRI

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Verma, CA
For Respondent: Shri M. Baranwal, Senior DR

PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), Faridabad dated 29th August, 2018.

1.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide email letter dated 28th 2. October, 2020 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

2 ITA-6846/Del/2018

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced in the presence of both the parties on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 16th November, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →