PUNARVASU TIE-UP PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACOT, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3037/DEL/2016Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 November 2020AY 2008-092 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2008-09. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA

For Appellant: Shri Divyansh Jain, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 16.11.2020Pronounced: 16.11.2020

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT

1.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-6, Kolkata dated 7.3.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2008-09.

2.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 29.10.2020, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee ITA 3037/D/2016 has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing in the presence of both the parties on 16th November, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →