SUDERSHAN PRASAD BAGARIA,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-36, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1463/KOL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata13 September 2022AY 2010-112 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the due taxes had been paid under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Senior DR had no objection to the withdrawal.

What were the facts?

The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and filed the necessary forms. The Competent Authority accepted the declaration and issued Form-3, after which the assessee remitted the tax. The assessee then sought to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be continued when the assessee has settled the tax liability under a settlement scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA

Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL

For Appellant: Shri Chirag Desai, AR
For Respondent: Smt. Ranu Biswas, Addl. CIT, DR
Hearing: 12.09.2022Pronounced: 13.09.2022

O R D E R

PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

1.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)-10, Kolkata dated 22.04.2019 for A.Y. 2010-11 against the assessment order passed u/s 147 r.s.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by ACIT, Circle-36, Kolkata. 2. Shri Chirag Desai, AR appeared for the assessee and Smt. Ranu Biswas, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the revenue.

3.

At the time of hearing Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Form no. 1 and Form no. 2 before the Competent Authority and the Competent Authority had accepted it and had issued Form-3. Thereafter the assessee has Sudershan Prasad Bagaria, A.Y: 2010-11 remitted the tax as per Form 3 and filed form no. 4 and is expecting Form 5 from the competent authority. Since the assessee-respondent has paid the due taxes, there is no point in keeping the impugned appeal pending. Apropos the discussion (supra) and since Sr. DR does not have any objection in withdrawing the same, we allow the assessee to withdraw the impugned appeal.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order is pronounced in the open court on 13 September, 2022

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →