SUDERSHAN PRASAD BAGARIA,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T.,CIRCLE-36, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the due taxes had been paid under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Senior DR had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and filed the necessary forms. The Competent Authority accepted the declaration and issued Form-3, after which the assessee remitted the tax. The assessee then sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be continued when the assessee has settled the tax liability under a settlement scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI SANJAY GARG & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
O R D E R
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)-10, Kolkata dated 22.04.2019 for A.Y. 2010-11 against the assessment order passed u/s 147 r.s.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by ACIT, Circle-36, Kolkata. 2. Shri Chirag Desai, AR appeared for the assessee and Smt. Ranu Biswas, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the revenue.
At the time of hearing Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and had filed Form no. 1 and Form no. 2 before the Competent Authority and the Competent Authority had accepted it and had issued Form-3. Thereafter the assessee has Sudershan Prasad Bagaria, A.Y: 2010-11 remitted the tax as per Form 3 and filed form no. 4 and is expecting Form 5 from the competent authority. Since the assessee-respondent has paid the due taxes, there is no point in keeping the impugned appeal pending. Apropos the discussion (supra) and since Sr. DR does not have any objection in withdrawing the same, we allow the assessee to withdraw the impugned appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order is pronounced in the open court on 13 September, 2022
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026