M/S SAFFRON INFRADEV PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-9(4), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the issue of penny stock transactions and additions under Section 68 for bogus long-term capital gains is covered by a recent Calcutta High Court decision. Therefore, the assessee's appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed exemption under Section 10(38) for long-term capital loss arising from share sales. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, treating the transactions as bogus penny stock. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the exemption under Section 10(38) for long-term capital loss from alleged penny stock transactions is admissible. Whether additions under Section 68 for bogus capital gains are justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]
ORDER
Per Shri Sonjoy Sarma, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order Ld. CIT(A) – 23, Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT’] dated 03.07.2019 passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The identical issue involved in the appeal is relating to the disallowance of claim of exemption u/s 10(38) in respect of long-term capital loss arising from the sale of shares.
No one appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the ld. DR stated that since the issue involved in this appeal is relating to the penny stock and the same is squarely covered against the assessee by the recent decision of the Calcutta High Court vide common order dated 14.06.2022 in a batch of 90 appeals with a lead case titled as PCIT vs. Swati Bajaj in IA No.GA/2/2022 and Others. The ld. DR has submitted that the facts and issue involved in the above appeals of the assessee are identical to that were before the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court. The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court vide its decision dated 14.06.2022 (supra) has affirmed the additions made by the Assessing Officer u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act in respect of bogus long-term capital gains. In view of this, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed.
M/s. Saffron Infradev Pvt. Ltd.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 15th September, 2022
More judgments on Section 10(38)
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Karan Dilipkumar Patel L/H of Late… vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi…ITA 353/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jay Patel, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-3(1), RaipurITA 684/RPR/2026[2015-16]Status: Heard12 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026