M/S SAFFRON INFRADEV PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-9(4), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2007/KOL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 September 2022AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the issue of penny stock transactions and additions under Section 68 for bogus long-term capital gains is covered by a recent Calcutta High Court decision. Therefore, the assessee's appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed exemption under Section 10(38) for long-term capital loss arising from share sales. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, treating the transactions as bogus penny stock. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance.

What were the issues?

Whether the exemption under Section 10(38) for long-term capital loss from alleged penny stock transactions is admissible. Whether additions under Section 68 for bogus capital gains are justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10(38),Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA

Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Hearing: 14.09.2022Pronounced: 15.09.2022

ORDER

Per Shri Sonjoy Sarma, JM:

1.

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order Ld. CIT(A) – 23, Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT’] dated 03.07.2019 passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

2.

The identical issue involved in the appeal is relating to the disallowance of claim of exemption u/s 10(38) in respect of long-term capital loss arising from the sale of shares.

3.

No one appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the ld. DR stated that since the issue involved in this appeal is relating to the penny stock and the same is squarely covered against the assessee by the recent decision of the Calcutta High Court vide common order dated 14.06.2022 in a batch of 90 appeals with a lead case titled as PCIT vs. Swati Bajaj in IA No.GA/2/2022 and Others. The ld. DR has submitted that the facts and issue involved in the above appeals of the assessee are identical to that were before the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court. The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court vide its decision dated 14.06.2022 (supra) has affirmed the additions made by the Assessing Officer u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act in respect of bogus long-term capital gains. In view of this, the appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed.

M/s. Saffron Infradev Pvt. Ltd.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 15th September, 2022

More judgments on Section 10(38)

All 3,113 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10(38) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →