VIMLA DEVI,MEERUT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2, MEERUT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3808/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 November 2020AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal as they had opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU

For Respondent: Shri. M Baranwal, Sr. DR

PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), New Delhi dated 24.04.2018.

2.

The assessee, vide its letter dated 04.11.2020, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

2 ITA-3808/Del/2018

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 25th November, 2020.

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →