SUMITRA DEVI SINGHAL,DELHI vs. ITO WARD 55(5), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2014-15. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI AMIT SHUKLASHRI AMIT SHUKLA SHRI AMIT SHUKLA SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), New Delhi dated 07.01.2019.
The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 01.12.2020, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.
2 ITA-2992/Del/2019
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing in the presence of both the parties on 04th December, 2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026