RAJESH SHAH (HUF),MUMBAI vs. ITO-24(3)(5), MUMBAI

PER BENCH This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 20.02.2019 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-36, Mumbai for the assessment year 2014-15. When the appeal was taken up for hearing, none was present on behalf of the assessee. However, the learned Authorized Representative of the assessee has filed letter dated 08.10.2021 seeking withdrawal of the appeal, as the assessee has opted for settling the dispute arising in the appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and has received certificate issued by the designated authority in Form 3. 2 Assessment Year: 2014-15 The learned Departmental Representative did not object to the aforesaid request of the assessee. In view of the aforesaid, we permit the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

म ुंबई Mumbai; दिन ुंक Dated: 18/11/2021 Alindra, PS आदेश प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आय क्त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 4. आयकर आय क्त / CIT 5. दिभ गीय प्रदिदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, म ुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, सत्य दपि प्रदि //// उि/सहायक िंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.