SAGARLAXMI AGRISEEDS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the lower authorities erred in disallowing depreciation on purchased goodwill. The AO failed to rebut the valuation report supporting the goodwill's value and did not obtain the necessary approval to determine the actual cost.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed depreciation on goodwill acquired from a proprietorship concern. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, arguing that the goodwill was not self-acquired by the proprietorship and its value was nil. The CIT(A) confirmed this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether depreciation on purchased goodwill is allowable when the valuation report is not rebutted by the revenue and whether the AO followed the correct procedure in determining the actual cost.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 32,Section 55(2)(a)(ii),Section 43(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Ashwin Vanaspati Industries v. CIT57 citing255 ITR 26 · 2002 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Weilburger Coatings (India) (P.) Ltd.31 citing155 Taxmann.com 580 · 2023 · HC
- Vudatha Vani Rao v. Income Tax Officer12 citing159 Taxmann.com 1394 · 2024 · ITAT
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Weilburger Coatings (India) (P.) Ltd.10 citing463 ITR 89 · 2024 · HC
- Chitra Publicity Co. (P) Ltd. v. ACIT8 citing127 TTJ 1 · 2010 · ITAT
- 580/296 Taxman 205/463 ITR 89 (Calcutta), Commissioner of Income-tax v. Venkatesa Spinners (P.) Ltd.5 citing296 ITR 205 · 2008 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: S/SHRI SANJAY GARG & NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member
The above appeal has been preferred by the assessee against order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)] dated 22.10.204 under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) arising out of the order of passed by the Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as “AO”) under section 143(3) of the Act pertaining to Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: Asst.Year: 2017-18 2
Tha
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 32
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Doms Industries Ltd, Valsad vs PCIT, ValsadITA 595/SRT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Aeon Formulations Private Limited, Chennai vs Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(1)…ITA 2481/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Fiitjee Limited, Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 9186/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Fiitjee Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 9185/DEL/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026