MAHENDRA PATEL BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,VADODARA vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of insurance premiums as not being for business purposes, finding the policies to be personal endowment plans. It also confirmed the disallowance of delayed employee PF contributions, relying on High Court precedent.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a real estate company, faced additions for unaccounted cash receipts from flat purchasers and disallowances for life insurance premiums paid on directors' policies and delayed employee PF contributions. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) rejected the assessee's explanations, citing lack of evidence and personal nature of expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether life insurance premiums paid on directors' policies are deductible business expenses, and whether delayed deposit of employee PF contributions are disallowable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 69A,Section 37(1),Section 36(1)(va),Section 153A,Section 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation1,158 citing366 ITR 170 · 2014 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: S/SHRI SANJAY GARG & MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKARAND
PER MAKARAND V.MAHADEOKAR, AM: These six appeals filed by the assessee for the Assessment Years 2015-16 to 2020–21 are directed against the respective appellate orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–12, Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as “Ld. CIT(A)”], all dated 18.03.2025, arising from assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer (ACIT, Central Circle−1(4), Ahmedabad) under section 153A r.w.s.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) for A.Ys.2015–16 to 2019–20, and under section
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026