TEAM HR SERVICES LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CORP CIR 3(1), CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as the AO had passed an order giving effect to the CIT(A)'s directions, deleting the disallowances after verification. The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2015-16. The CIT(A) had directed the AO to verify and allow certain issues including disallowance of employee ESI/PF contribution and support service charges.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the allowability of employee ESI/PF contributions and support service charges. The appeal became infructuous due to subsequent actions by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal
O R D E R
PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) 7, Chennai, dated 10.12.2018 relevant to the assessment year 2015-16.
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has filed a letter dated 30.06.2022, wherein, it was stated as under:
Sub: Withdrawal of appeal on account of receipt of order giving effect dated April 05, 2019. This is with reference to the captioned appeal filed by the Appellant before the Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (“ Hon’ble ITAT) on March 12, 2019, which is pending before the Hon’ble “B” Bench and is posted for hearing today i.e., June, 30, 2022. In this regard, it is most humbly submitted that for the captioned AY 2015-16, the Learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) (“CIT(A”) vide his order dated December 10, 2018 directed the Assessing Officer (“AO”) to verify and accordingly, allow the following issues:
1. 1. Disallowance of employee contribution to ESI/PF.
2. Disallowance of support service charges under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act.
3. Credit of TDS in accordance with form 26AS 4. Interest u/s 234B of the Act. Based on the above directions, the AO passed an order giving effect on April 5, 2019 (enclosed as Annexure) to the order of the CIT(A) wherein the above disallowances were deleted after verification. In the light of the above, the Appellant prays before your Honours for withdrawal of the captioned appeal.”
3. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the appeal, against which, the ld. DR has not opposed to the submissions of the ld. Counsel. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 15th July, 2022 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026