What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2015-16. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Sunil Kumar Jain, New Delhi vs ACIT | ITAT Delhi 2020

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVASHRI SHRI

For Appellant: Shri Aditya Jain, CA

For Respondent: Shri Jagdish Singh, Senior DR

PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-38, New Delhi dated 29th April, 2019.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide email dated 15th 2. December, 2020 has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

2 ITA-5395/Del/2019

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced in the presence of both the sides on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 18th December, 2020.

SUNIL KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 18(2), NEW DELHI

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Recent GST High Court judgments