SANJIVANI NON FERROUS TRADING P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-22(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6640/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 December 2020AY 2008-092 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2008-09. The assessee subsequently opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for dispute resolution.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVASHRI SHRI

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Mahana, CA
For Respondent: Shri Jagdish Singh, Senior DR

PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU VP VP : VP This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2008-09 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-31, New Delhi dated 12.09.2018.

2.

The learned counsel for the assessee has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

2 ITA-6640/Del/2018

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

1.

Above decision was announced in the presence of both the sides on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 18th December, 2020.

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →